Cash for Life, Right now?
Here’s a thought,
Consider the Ontario Lottery Corporation’s game “Cash for Life”. It’s the scratch and win game card where you hope to match up three identical “Cash for Life” symbols. If you do, you’ll receive $1000 every week for 20 years. Sounds good to me!
That adds up to a whopping total sum ($1000×52*20) $1,040,000 bucks over 20 years.
$1000 a week over time can buy you some fancy clothes or watches. Over some more time perhaps a decent used car. Or maybe you wait the long haul and save up for a child’s education. OR maybe you wait even looooonger and save up for a new home purchase. In that case lets say you want to buy a $250,000 home. That’s going to take (($250,000/$1,000)/52) 4.81 years to save up for.
So, what if we could determine how much the future sums of the cash flow is worth today and convince the lottery to pay that amount out to us in one lump sum of cash to do what ever we want with?
Here’s the numbers;
First, we’ll have to reference the trade-off between the sum of cash flows over the 20 years to the present sum of cash by the interest rate at which we will assume is constant. The Bank of Canada posts it’s 20 year government bond rate to be approx. 3.45% annually. I’ll choose 4% and imply that it would be more probable in a more stable less volatile interest rate environment. It’s an arguable assumption but that’s what were going to use. Don’t like it, tough! (There are several more robust ways to compute an interest rate assumption, but this is supposed to be quick and fun, not long and arduous)
Also, I have to set out the compounding frequency and number of periods. Given that we have 52 weeks in a year and the cash flows go on for 20 years, we have 1,040 compounding periods. Since were using weekly figures for the compounding period, we must do the same to the interest rate which will be used at 0.0769%.
So to make a long story short; the calculation’s using the inputs of 1040 cash flow periods (52*20), a weekly interest rate (4%/52) of 0.0769% and a cash flow amount of $1000.
Using my handy present value function on my calculator we find an answer that suggests that, given the inputs, a person is likely to accept $715,692.70 in lieu of $1000 a week for 20 years. In essence, the calculation says that based on a persons total risk aversion and opportunity cost of %4, one would accept $715,692.70 today in exchange for $1,040,000 over time.
Now maybe not all of you are agreeing; I’m not a surprised. Some people would prefer to live modestly and would be quite happy with $1,000 a week for 20 years. Some people may rather live dangerously and take that lump sum and invest it in high risk ventures or off track horse racing hoping to turn the $700,000 into much more. It’s all based on the person.
Since the chances of being one of the 4 people to win the jackpot each time OLG runs this game is 0.0000581% we won’t actually have to worry about having this problem. Interestingly enough, the OLG does give the winners the option of choosing a lump sum over a weekly payout. But it comes not without its penalties such as a cap on how long a term one can use to calculate the present value or the risk of the OLG using a discount rate below standard Bank of Canada rates. Not to mention, there are legal fees that have to be dealt with.
It’s an interesting thought though…
What would you do?

Two options, first, If you’re looking for a lump sum payout, play the lottery. With the Maxmillions game it gives the player far better odds to compete for larger sums of money. Second, if 52,000 a year isn’t enough money to help supplement you annual average income then get greedy and play the Cash for life double. Which if you win, entitles you to 2,000 a week for the rest of your life…(20 years)
This is a good approach to what, for some, may be a controversial topic. Very well though out post. – Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life. – Immanuel Kant
Dude. First of all, cash for life is for >LIFE<… till you drop. I called the olg line. Second, why are you talking about saving for 4.328794682736487 years for a house when you wait 10-20 weeks for a down payment and then carry the mortgage with the 1000 you get every week. Anyone who chooses the lump sum is an idiot.. unless you are like 40+ and if you are.. DONT PLAY A GAME THAT BENEFITS YOUNGER PEOPLE.. god. every winner has been some old useless lady who opts for the lump sum.. PLAY ANOTHER GAME MORONS.
Well, you clearly didn’t phone the line. It states that on the official game rules sheet on the website how long the term is as per rule 5.10 in the payment of prizes section. (http://www.olg.ca/assets/documents/game_conditions/rules_respecting_lottery_games.pdf).
Also, you wait 10-20 weeks for the down payment you would only be able to buy a house for 100,000 so that you would by pass the premium that you would have to pay on your Mortgage because of CMHC (in Canada). Also why would you want to pay a bank interest if you don’t have too. It would lesson the purchasing power of the money your entitled to.
Thanks for the comment though… its been a pleasure.
Love the new look
Stopping by to say hello! And also let you know that as my circumstances have it right now – I’d take the lump sum and run!
Enjoy your day!
Excellent choice Megan! I’d do the same all considering for sure!
I think I would take the lump sum. Even at 4-5% interest per year, icould still get close to 40k in passive income!
Hmmmm… would take the payout… definitely. Would rather the money in my bank account collecting interest, and who knows, maybe the olg will go out of buisness before my 20 years of payments is up. Improbable yes, but so is winning the damn thing in the first place….hahaha
haha, I never considered the possibility of OLG disappearing! Add a premium for default risk then!
Thanks for the comment!